August3 , 2026

    Zim faces FMC probe into $137,000 detention fees after container ‘error’

    Related

    Centre Appoints Prashant Jeevan Patil as Deputy Director General of DG Shipping

    The Central Government has appointed Prashant Jeevan Patil, an...

    Hyderabad Customs Reviews Budget 2026 Reforms, Reports Strong Revenue Growth

    An interactive session on the Customs reforms announced in...

    JSW Tuticorin Terminal Sets New Monthly Cargo Handling Record at VOC Port

    JSW Tuticorin Multi Purpose Terminal Private Limited (JSWTMTPL), which...

    V.O. Chidambaranar Port Enhances Fertilizer Cargo Handling Efficiency with Infrastructure Upgrades

    V.O. Chidambaranar Port Authority (VOCPA) has further strengthened its...

    Kamarajar Port Sets New Records in Container and Rail Cargo Handling

    Kamarajar Port has achieved a new milestone in container...

    Share

    Israeli carrier Zim faces being hauled up in front of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) after allegations that it breached the US Shipping Act.

    Yesterday, non-vessel operating common carrier (NVOCC) Baylink claimed that in June 2021, an operator called Koyote Trucking collected a Baylink container from Zim without authorisation or a delivery order.

    According to the complaint, Baylink only found out about this some two months later and “subsequently learned that the container had not been timely returned to Zim”.

    The container was not returned until April 2023, racking up 628 days of detention charges. Zim then said that having failed to retrieve the fees from Koyote, it would be seeking payment of just under $137,000 from Baylink.

    Baylink says it “requested that Zim provide it with the identity of the trucker that retrieved the container, and provide Baylink with the container pick-up documents which would identify the trucker”,

    Despite requests, claims Baylink, Zim “failed and refused” to provide either the identity of the trucker or the documents.

    Reiterating that “at no time did Baylink have a business relationship with Koyote Trucking”, the claim is that “Zim wrongly and improperly delivered the container to Koyote”.

    The complaint adds: “Baylink had no financial incentive to facilitate the return of the container, as Zim had failed to inform Baylink that Zim would hold Baylink responsible for any detention of the container and, in fact, Zim communicated that it would hold [cargo owner] Riomar responsible for any detention.”

    Baylink claims it was Zim’s “actions and omissions” that precluded Baylink from facilitating the timely return of the container”.

    spot_img