November11 , 2026

    Chattogram Halts Steep Container Storage Fee Hike

    Related

    RCL Commits $213 Million to Two 9,200 TEU Container Ships

    Thailand’s Regional Container Lines (RCL) has ordered two 9,200...

    COSCO Shipping Energy Unveils $1.42 Billion VLCC Orders, Plans 14 More on Charter

    COSCO Shipping Energy Transportation has announced plans to add...

    Indian Customs Brokers Threaten Cargo Boycott Over Empty Container Fee Hikes

    A growing dispute over empty container handling charges and...

    Hormuz Disruption Leaves Delta Ports’ Berths at Mormugao Idle, Hopes Rise for Cargo Revival

    The prolonged Iran-US conflict and disruption to shipping through...

    Share

    Chattogram Port Authority has suspended a planned fourfold increase in container storage charges, providing relief to shipping lines, importers and exporters concerned about higher logistics costs. The decision follows industry feedback over the potential impact of the sharp tariff revision on trade operations.

    The proposed increase in storage fees was aimed at encouraging faster container clearance and improving yard utilisation at Bangladesh’s busiest seaport. However, industry stakeholders raised concerns that the higher charges could increase supply chain expenses and add pressure on businesses already facing global trade challenges.

    With the suspension of the revised charges, existing container storage rates will continue while authorities review the matter and assess the impact on port operations. The move is expected to support smoother cargo handling and maintain trade flow stability through the port.

    Chattogram Port handles the majority of Bangladesh’s containerised trade and plays a critical role in the country’s import and export supply chain. Authorities continue to focus on reducing container congestion, improving operational efficiency and ensuring better utilisation of port infrastructure.

    The suspension provides temporary relief to the shipping and logistics sector while discussions continue on balancing port efficiency goals with the cost concerns of trade stakeholders.