August21 , 2026

    Maersk Maintains Felixstowe Fuel Surcharge at September Levels

    Related

    MV Densa Eagle Berths at Deendayal Port with 47,250 MT of Granular Urea

    MV Densa Eagle has berthed at Deendayal Port, Kandla,...

    VOC Port Conducts 2nd Annual ISPS Code Statement of Compliance Audit

    V.O. Chidambaranar Port Authority underwent the 2nd Annual Statement...

    APSEZ Poised to Secure Dry Bulk Berths at Paradip Port

    Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd (APSEZ) is...

    India Boosts Air Cargo Efficiency with 20-Hour Transit Target

    India has significantly accelerated domestic-to-international air cargo transshipment by...

    Delhi Airport Expands Air Cargo Network to London and Copenhagen

    Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport has expanded India’s domestic-to-international...

    Share

    Maersk will keep its Emergency Fuel Surcharge (EFS) at the Port of Felixstowe unchanged at £3.82 ($5.18) per import laden container from September 1, 2026. The decision follows the carrier’s latest review of the surcharge level.

    The £3.82 rate was introduced from August 1, when Maersk reduced the Felixstowe EFS from £4.17 to £3.82 per import laden container. The carrier had indicated that the surcharge would be reviewed again in mid-August for September.

    The latest decision means importers using Felixstowe will continue to pay the same emergency fuel-related charge during September, providing some stability in landed transport costs.

    The surcharge forms part of Maersk’s mechanism for responding to changes in fuel and operating costs affecting port and inland logistics. Previous reviews have resulted in significant adjustments, including an increase from £2.95 to £5.38 in May and subsequent reductions during the summer.

    By maintaining the current rate, Maersk is avoiding another increase for Felixstowe imports despite continuing volatility in global fuel and shipping markets.

    The September decision will be closely watched by importers, freight forwarders and other supply-chain participants, particularly as fuel costs and geopolitical disruptions continue to influence transportation expenses.