September8 , 2026

    US east coast carriers and rail operators introduce pre-strike restrictions

    Related

    JNPA’s Centralized Parking Plaza Boosts Efficiency in Container Truck Operations

    The Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority (JNPA) is strengthening its...

    Empty-Container Standoff Disrupts Operations at Mundra Port

    Operations at Mundra Port are facing growing disruption as...

    JNPA Achieves Record 831,956 TEUs in August

    Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority (JNPA) handled a record 831,956...

    Meghalaya–Sikkim Media Delegation Visits Cochin Port to Explore Maritime Connectivity

    A joint media delegation from Meghalaya and Sikkim, currently...

    VOC Port Sets New Single-Day Cargo Handling Record at 2.17 Lakh Tonnes

    V.O. Chidambaranar Port Authority has achieved its highest-ever single-day...

    Share

    With just a week before an increasingly probable US East and Gulf Coast port strike, carriers have been laying out contingency plans including pre-emptively halting inland cargo movement and announcing new congestion-related surcharges.

    Maersk said it will implement a ‘local port disruption surcharge’ for all cargo moving to and from the US east and Gulf coast terminals from 21 October “depending on the impact of the disruption to the supply chain”, of $1,500 per teu and $3,000 per feu.

    “This surcharge is necessary to cover the higher operational costs that will be incurred due to the service disruptions,” explained the Danish carrier.

    From 19 October, Hapag-Lloyd will implement a Work Interruption Destination Surcharge (WID) for imports to the US east and Gulf coast from East Asia and a Work Disruption Surcharge (WDS) from the rest of the world on 18 October, both at $1,000 per teu.

    CMA CGM’s 11 October surcharge will be $800 per teu and $1,000 per feu for all exports from east and Gulf coast ports, and an import surcharge of $1,500 per teu.

    It will also add a peak season surcharge of $1,000 per unit to imports from the Indian Subcontinent and Middle East on 1 November, postponed from 1 October.

    Japanese carrier ONE has yet to announce surcharges but warned that booking adjustments, including rolls to other vessels or cancellations, may be needed from this week.

    North American intermodal operator CSX said in the event of a strike it would “work port by port to take traffic… as long as [it] can safely access the terminal” and will accept imports “up until the port goes on strike”.

    However, it yesterday halted Canadian exports via the interchange it operates with Canadian National until further notice, explaining that cargo enroute will not be accessible if it is stuck on the rail.

    Maersk also noted that terminals’ ability to monitor reefer containers will be impacted during a strike and encouraged exporters to “plan accordingly” to avoid damage to temperature-controlled cargo.

    ONE similarly encouraged customers to pick up their import cargo prior to 30 September, advising that “reefers might not be monitored while ports are closed”.

    The Japanese carrier will pause acceptance of new US reefer export bookings for vessels departing on or after 1 October, and Hapag-Lloyd will not accept refrigerated reservations at its inland terminals after 26 September.

    Hapag will also stop loading East Coast export traffic from 29 September and will hold all export traffic at its inland terminals between 30 September and 1 October.

    “On October 1, 2024, we will reassess if reservations need to be cancelled,” it said

    “Our main goal is to take traffic as long as possible but also be careful not to put reefer traffic at risk.  Holding export units at origin starting 30/9, is to avoid having any freight sit outside of a terminal and subject the loaded freight to vandalism.”

    Founder of detention, demurrage and maritime dispute company FourOneOne, Sara Dandan, said: “I feel like any freight forwarder worth their salt has contingencies in place to mitigate any issues caused by a strike at these ports.

    “I think we’ve all been given so much warning that most shippers and forwarders have alternative plans and routes in place. Or at least they should,” she concluded.