Iran is considering a proposal to impose transit fees on vessels passing through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, a move that could significantly impact global energy flows and maritime trade.
According to reports from the Iranian Students’ News Agency, an Iranian lawmaker confirmed that parliament is reviewing a bill that would require countries using the strait for shipping, energy transport, and food supplies to pay tolls and taxes to Tehran. The proposal is being framed as a way to leverage Iran’s geographic advantage over one of the world’s most critical maritime corridors.
The development comes amid heightened geopolitical tensions following the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Israel against Iran. Since the outbreak of hostilities, Tehran has intermittently disrupted maritime traffic through the strait, particularly targeting vessels it claims are linked to its adversaries and their allies.
The Strait of Hormuz is a critical artery for global trade, handling nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments. Any attempt to impose transit fees or restrict passage could have far-reaching implications for energy markets, shipping costs, and supply chain stability worldwide.
Adding to the rhetoric, Mohammad Mokhber, an adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, indicated that Tehran may introduce a “new regime” for the strait once the conflict subsides. This could include the ability to impose maritime restrictions on countries that have sanctioned Iran.
“By using the strategic position of the Strait of Hormuz, we can sanction the West and prevent their ships from passing through this waterway,” Mokhber was quoted as saying by Mehr News Agency.
Industry analysts warn that such a move would likely face strong international opposition, as the strait is widely regarded as an international waterway under global maritime norms. Any unilateral imposition of transit fees or restrictions could escalate tensions further and disrupt already fragile global supply chains.
If implemented, the proposal could mark a significant shift in how one of the world’s most important shipping lanes is governed, with potential ripple effects across energy security, freight markets, and geopolitical stability.