May19 , 2026

    Misdirected Grain Claim Highlights Risks for Marine Surveyors, Warns ITIC

    Related

    IPA Holds Talks With Labour Federations on Wage Settlement, Welfare Issues

    The Indian Ports Association (IPA), New Delhi, under the...

    Building Resilient Supply Chains in a Volatile World

    India Seatrade News Interview with Smitha Shetty, Director –...

    MEPZ SEZ Approves ₹450 Crore Projects Across Tamil Nadu Region

    The Unit Approval Committee (UAC) of the Madras Export...

    Bangkok to Host APAC Last-Mile Logistics Summit

    Industry leaders from the last-mile logistics, supply chain and...

    Share

    A US$30,000 claim over an off-spec grain cargo has prompted the International Transport Intermediaries Club (ITIC) to caution marine surveyors about the legal and financial risks arising from unclear or poorly documented instructions.

    The case involved a marine surveyor appointed by a cargo seller to conduct a joint survey at the load port. The buyer accepted the cargo and subsequently resold it. However, at the discharge port, the final buyer alleged the shipment was off-spec due to the presence of ambrosia seeds and other impurities.

    Following a discounted resale, the original buyer sought to recover losses of US$30,000—initially from the seller and later from the seller’s surveyor—claiming negligence for failing to test certain parameters during the survey.

    Upon review, ITIC found that the surveyor had acted strictly within the scope of the seller’s instructions. Notably, the buyer had also appointed its own surveyor at the time of loading, operating under a separate mandate. ITIC concluded that the seller’s surveyor owed no duty of care to the buyer, rendering the claim misdirected and without legal basis.

    Mark Brattman, Claims Director at ITIC, said the incident underscores how surveyors can become exposed when assumptions are made about the scope of their work after disputes arise.

    “This case shows how vulnerable marine surveyors can become when parties later assume that certain checks or tests should have been carried out, even where those tasks were never part of the agreed instructions,” he said.

    ITIC noted that disputes of this nature are particularly common in grain and agricultural commodity trades, where expectations around testing can differ widely. Even when a specific test is not contractually required, its absence may still trigger disputes if it is considered standard practice within the trade.

    Brattman emphasised that clear documentation remains the strongest safeguard for surveyors. “If a principal instructs you not to carry out a check that would ordinarily be expected, record that instruction and reflect it clearly in the report,” he added.

    ITIC has urged marine surveyors to formally agree and document their scope of work before undertaking assignments. It also recommends that survey reports explicitly outline both the tests conducted and those excluded, helping to prevent disputes from escalating into liability claims.

    spot_img